Prediction of Nao Hibino [216th] vs Irem Kurt [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L W L W
Form
W L W L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Hibino 1 - 0 Kurt
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hibino winning 2 and Kurt winning 0. The last match between Hibino and Kurt was at the Megasaray Hotels Open 2 - Antalya, 23-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | 1 |
| Irem Kurt | 0 |
| Hibino | Stats | Kurt |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (10-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 216 | Ranking | N/A |
| 56 | Highest Rank | |
| 30 | Age | 17 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (391-324) | Career Total W/L | 35% (15-28) |
| $1,495,257 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Irem Kurt
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:0:29 | Average Match Time | 1:0:29 |
| 76% (29/38) | 1st Serve % | 77% (40/52) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (16/40) |
| 67% (6/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (2/12) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 65% (34/52) | Return Points Win % | 26% (10/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nao Hibino vs Irem Kurt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 0 Kurt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 39.34% of points on their second serve, while Kurt has won 38.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 49.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kurt has won 50.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.8% and 33.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kurt has saved 40.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 41.82% of matches played (W/L 23/ 32), with Kurt winning 27.27% (W/L 3/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 283/ 216), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 48/ 58). Kurt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 15/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 15/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12), where as Kurt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 3/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hibino winning 1 times and Kurt being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hibino winning 2 and Kurt winning 0. The last match between Hibino and Kurt was at the Megasaray Hotels Open 2 - Antalya, 23-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Kurt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hibino winning 0 times and Kurt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Kurt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 148.35 while Kurt has played against players with an average rank of 285.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kurt has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 36.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kurt has converted 38.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
78%
(
81 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Nao Hibino
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
43
Total Points Won
46
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Nao Hibino
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Irem Kurt
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Irem Kurt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Irem Kurt
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Irem Kurt
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Player
Irem Kurt
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Dols
Player
Irem Kurt
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Dols
Player
Irem Kurt
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irem Kurt
Player
Rada Zolotareva
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamilah Snells
Player
Irem Kurt
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
45%
(
36 of
80)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Irem Kurt
Player
Daniela Darta Feldmane
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Hibino vs Kurt?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Hibino Vs Kurt is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (391/324) | Win/Loss | 35% (15/28) |
| 53% (870/769) | Sets Win/Loss | 35% (32/60) |
| 52% (7728/7239) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (363/471) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 982 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1503 | Total Double Faults | 76 |
| 1:11:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 458.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 207.4 |
| 65% (24313/37255) | 1st Serve % | 57% (796/1408) |
| 61% (14745/24313) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (423/796) |
| 46% (6016/12939) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (235/612) |
| 48% (2166/4554) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (64/162) |
| 45% (16791/37547) | Return Points Win % | 42% (624/1476) |
| 55% (384/703) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (15/43) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (84/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/6) |
| 57% (121/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 86% (368/318) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (14/13) |
| 13% (368/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (14/1) |
| 20% (347/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (29/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
